Skip to main content
· 5/15/1991

Commonwealth v. Bazabe

Citations

  • 590 A.2d 1298
  • 404 Pa. Super. 408
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating an appellant must make an offer of proof as to how he would have testified.
  • where issue is whether evidentiary hearing must be held, it is settled law that mere boilerplate allegations will not suffice to require hearing
  • a bald allegation that counsel was ineffective for interfering with the defendant’s right to testify at trial does not entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing on his petition because “mere boilerplate allegations will not suffice to require a hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamilia, Johnson, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.