Skip to main content
· 12/21/2000

Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. Partnership

Citations

  • 764 A.2d 1100
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 400
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellants waived their challenges to summary judgment by failing to raise them in the trial court
  • holding that a party waives any grounds for relief on appeal that the party did not present in response to the opposing party’s motion for summary judgment
  • stating that, “[b]ecause, under [Pa.R.C.P.] 1035.3, the non-moving party must respond to a motion for summary judgment, he or she bears the same responsibility as in any proceeding, to raise all defenses or grounds for relief at the first opportunity.”
  • stating that, “[b]ecause, under [Pa.R.C.P.] 1035.3, the non-moving party must respond to a motion for summary judgment, he or she bears the same responsibility as in any proceeding, to raise all defenses or grounds for relief at the first opportunity.”
  • “If the non- moving party does not respond, the trial court may grant summary judgment on that basis.” (citing Pa.R.C.P. 1035.3(d)
  • “If the non- moving party does not respond, the trial court may grant summary judgment on that basis.” (citing Pa.R.C.P. 1035.3(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Johnson, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.