Alaska Supreme Court· 12/22/1975
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 544 P.2d 65
- 1975 Alas. LEXIS 325
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that no due process violation occurs where party who was denied opportunity to be heard on issue is later afforded opportunity to brief and argue merits through motion for reconsideration}; Gallant v. Gallant, 945 P.2d 795, 799-800 (Alaska 1997
- noting that the court's inherent power to enforce its decrees may justify a court in going even beyond the parties' requests
- holding no due process violation where party denied opportunity to be heard on issue is later afforded opportunity to brief and argue merits through motion for reconsideration
- \The determination of the need for a guardian ad litem is left within the sound discretion of the trial judge.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Erwin, Boochever, Burke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-04-04· cited 115×
- Flores v. FloresAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-07-13· cited 63×
- Cedergreen v. CedergreenAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-05-24· cited 41×
- Carvalho v. CarvalhoAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-09-04· cited 26×
- Gallant v. GallantAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-09-30· cited 20×
- Williams v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-11-16· cited 20×
- Berry v. BerryAlaska Supreme Court· 2012-06-01· cited 20×
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. Greenpeace, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-06-18· cited 19×
- Wahl v. WahlAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-10-16· cited 18×
- Thomas v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-08-04· cited 13×
- Taylor National, Inc. v. Jensen Bros. Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1982-02-02· cited 11×
- Stein v. KelsoAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-02-05· cited 10×
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-05-19· cited 10×
- State, Department of Revenue v. DeLeonAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-12-17· cited 9×
- Ryfeul v. RyfeulAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-09-10· cited 8×
- Brown v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-07-30· cited 7×
- Ronne v. RonneAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-09-16· cited 6×
- Bravo v. AkerAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-01-04· cited 4×
- Hayes v. Alaska USA Federal Credit UnionAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-01-20· cited 3×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 2,202×
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,797×
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,218×
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court· 1921-12-19· cited 592×
- RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-07-09· cited 178×
- Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-04-01· cited 99×
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-01-20· cited 79×
- Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-10-06· cited 69×
- Wagstaff v. Superior Court, Family Court DivisionAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 61×
- Sheridan v. SheridanAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-03-20· cited 44×
- Carle v. CarleAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-12-08· cited 43×
- Etheredge v. BradleyAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-10-27· cited 43×
- City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court· 1963-03-13· cited 43×
- Serway v. GalentineCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-06-24· cited 40×
- Frontier Saloon, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-07-15· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.