State, Department of Revenue v. DeLeon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that whether superior court has express or inherent authority over a dispute is question of law the court reviews de novo
• holding that whether superior court had \authority to order a delinquent parent to apply for a permanent fund dividend to enforce a child support order\ was question of law
• reviewing de novo whether superior court had authority to order party to apply for permanent fund dividend
• “Alaska Statute 25.27 has the purpose of ensuring that parents meet their support obligations.”
• \The principle of expressio unius est exclusio alterius directs the court to presume that a statute designating only certain powers excludes those not specifically designated....\ (citing Croft v. Pan Alaska Trucking, Inc., 820 P.2d 1064, 1066 (Alaska 1991))
• superior court order issued in 2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).