Frontier Saloon, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state and federal due process clauses require hearing before license can be suspended by Board
• holding that although a statute did not require a hearing before the suspension of a liquor license, a hearing was required by due process
• rejecting argument that no hearing was required because Saloon owner’s conviction for allowing minor on premises was sufficient to also adjudicate licensure termination based on existence of conviction
• due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to the taking of a valuable property right
• “[T]he hearing required need not be an elaborate one. The Supreme Court has frequently provided that due process does not require a full-scale hearing in every situation to which due process applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).