Oregon Supreme Court· 12/23/1986
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 730 P.2d 1221
- 302 Or. 382
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- entertaining, albeit denying on merits, collateral challenge to dissolution judgment on ground of extrinsic fraud under ORCP 71 C
- denying relief from judgment modifying support when motion for relief was based on evidence of intrinsic fraud discovered after entry of judgment
- explaining that a summary judgment motion that merely chal- lenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint is “functionally equivalent” to a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or for a judgment on the pleadings (internal citations omitted)
- explaining that a summary judgment motion that merely chal- lenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint is “functionally equivalent” to a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or for a judgment on the pleadings (internal citations omitted)
- noting a motion for summary judgment supported only by the pleadings is functionally equivalent to a motion for failure to state a claim or a motion for judgment on the pleadings
- “ORCP 71 is a modified form of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, adapted to Oregon cases and practice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Greeninger v. CromwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 23×
- Batlan v. Bledsoe (In Re Bledsoe)Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-25· cited 22×
- Wimber v. TimpeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-10-02· cited 21×
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 17×
- Greeninger v. CromwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-04-17· cited 16×
- Fadel v. EL-TOBGYCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-28· cited 14×
- Estate of Hutchins v. FargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-02· cited 12×
- JRD Development Joint Venture v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-04· cited 10×
- In re the Marriage of WeaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 10×
- Skeen v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 9×
- JRD Development Joint Venture v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-10· cited 9×
- Heritage Properties v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-23· cited 8×
- Dunkin v. DunkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 7×
- Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. M. R. (In re A. R. L. U.)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-02-06· cited 7×
- Stone v. WittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-10· cited 7×
- Humphrey v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-22· cited 6×
- In Re the Marriage of ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-12-17· cited 6×
- Batlan v. Bledsoe (In Re Bledsoe)D. Oregon· 2006-09-26· cited 5×
- Stein v. Burt & Vetterlein, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-15· cited 4×
- State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-09· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Payless Drug Stores Northwest v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1985-11-05· cited 53×
- Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-10-30· cited 45×
- Friese v. HummelOregon Supreme Court· 1894-07-24· cited 30×
- Oregon-Washington R. & Navigation Co. v. ReidOregon Supreme Court· 1937-02-10· cited 18×
- Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-02-21· cited 10×
- Wallace v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1916-09-19· cited 10×
- Windsor v. HollowayOregon Supreme Court· 1917-05-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.