Skip to main content

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 730 P.2d 1221
  • 302 Or. 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • entertaining, albeit denying on merits, collateral challenge to dissolution judgment on ground of extrinsic fraud under ORCP 71 C
  • denying relief from judgment modifying support when motion for relief was based on evidence of intrinsic fraud discovered after entry of judgment
  • explaining that a summary judgment motion that merely chal- lenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint is “functionally equivalent” to a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or for a judgment on the pleadings (internal citations omitted)
  • explaining that a summary judgment motion that merely chal- lenges the legal sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint is “functionally equivalent” to a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or for a judgment on the pleadings (internal citations omitted)
  • noting a motion for summary judgment supported only by the pleadings is functionally equivalent to a motion for failure to state a claim or a motion for judgment on the pleadings
  • “ORCP 71 is a modified form of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, adapted to Oregon cases and practice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.