Windsor v. Holloway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a finding that “the claims are without merit, does not necessarily support the conclusion that the plaintiff’s claims were frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless”
• acknowledging that “[a] prevailing defendant should only recover upon a finding by the district court that the plaintiff’s action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, even though not brought in subjective bad faith” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Rule 56 is a tool to narrow the factual and legal issues to be brought to trial but does not necessarily mean that a finding not in favor of a plaintiff means that the plaintiff had no basis for filing a complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).