Greeninger v. Cromwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the UFTA applies to a division of property under a divorce decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Estes v. Titus
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2008-07-02· cited 319×
• Mejia v. Reed
  California Supreme Court· 2003-08-14· cited 243×
• Canty v. Otto
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-05-01· cited 32×
• Batlan v. Bledsoe (In Re Bledsoe)
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-25· cited 22×
• Fadel v. EL-TOBGY
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-28· cited 14×
• Dowell v. Dennis
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-04-28· cited 13×
• Estes v. Titus
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-14· cited 11×
• Acott v. Newton & O'Connor
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2011-06-21· cited 7×
• Batlan v. Bledsoe (In Re Bledsoe)
  D. Oregon· 2006-09-26· cited 5×
• Jan Kay Estes v. Jeff Edward Titus
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2008-07-02
• Mejia v. Reed
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-06-12
• Bledsoe v. Bledsoe
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-25

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morrill v. Morrill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1890-11-24· cited 110×
• Jones v. General Motors Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 54×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-12-23· cited 36×
• Kardynalski v. Fisher
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-08-12· cited 24×
• Greeninger v. Cromwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 23×
• Wood v. White
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-01-17· cited 11×