Johnson v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although a double recovery may not be had, the jury is not prohibited from allocating a total damages award between different theories of recovery.”
• “Although a double recovery may not be had, the jury is not prohibited from allocating a total damages award between different theories of recovery.”
• because the defendant “chose not to present evidence of his inability to pay a large punitive award,” he was unable to complain on appeal that the jury did not consider such evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michigan First Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-05-24· cited 52×
• Gibson v. Moskowitz
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 44×
• Nikos Kidis v. Jean Reid
  Sixth Circuit· 2020-09-25· cited 35×
• In re Simon II Litigation
  E.D. New York· 2002-09-19· cited 25×
• Woodruff v. Ohman
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-02-06· cited 22×
• Stuckey v. Online Resources Corp.
  S.D. Ohio· 2012-11-09· cited 5×
• Murphy v. Gilman
  W.D. Michigan· 2008-04-24· cited 4×

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-28· cited 2,781×
• General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,072×
• Quercia v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1933-05-29· cited 943×
• Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2001-05-14· cited 874×
• Norman Braley v. City of Pontiac, Stanley Helgemo, Sergeant Arthur Rouse and Roland Garcia, Officers
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-06-19· cited 371×
• Provost v. City of Newburgh
  Second Circuit· 2001-08-17· cited 333×
• United States v. Leonard Lloyd (92-2106) Shawn Huffman (92-2108) Darryl Little (92-2146) and Mario Taylor (92-2175)
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-10-29· cited 233×
• Thomas F. Bennis, Roger J. MacLean v. Carson S. Gable, Joseph S. Daddona, City of Allentown
  Third Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 192×
• Spray-Rite Service Corporation, an Iowa Corporation v. Monsanto Company, a Delaware Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-09-08· cited 169×
• Douglas Edwards v. City of Philadelphia and Officer Haworth, James, Badge No. 2944
  Third Circuit· 1988-11-21· cited 143×
• Logue v. Dore
  First Circuit· 1997-01-08· cited 119×
• United States v. Henry Vance
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-06-06· cited 116×
• Christina A. Woods-Drake v. C. L. Lundy
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-02-18· cited 113×
• United States v. David Middleton
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-04-18· cited 97×
• Gentile v. County of Suffolk
  Second Circuit· 1991-02-11· cited 97×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Joseph Carlton, Intervening v. Harbert-Yeargin, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-09-21· cited 88×
• 47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1409, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,260 Madison Anderson v. Walter Sheppard, Ford Motor Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1988-11-17· cited 84×
• Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-10-28· cited 73×
• Bankers Life & Casualty Company v. C. M. Kirtley, Trustee in Corporate Reorganization Proceedings of Automatic Washer Company
  Eighth Circuit· 1962-08-24· cited 69×
• Leon Bates v. J.W. Jean
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-12· cited 66×