Sixth Circuit· 2/6/2002
Woodruff v. Ohman
Citations
- 29 F. App'x 337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize”
- concluding that “the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize”
- recognizing that punitive damages “cannot be awarded independent of a judgment of liability under” Section 1983
- explaining that an apology is designed to address a moral wrong rather than a legal wrong
- concluding “the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize” and holding that “[w]e are not commissioned to run around getting apologies”
- concluding in a § 1983 action that “the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize” and holding that “‘[w]e are not commissioned to run around getting apologies’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batchelder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- C. Sue Schwamberger v. Marion Cnty. Bd. of ElectionsSixth Circuit· 2021-02-17· cited 12×
- Moates v. Hamilton CountyE.D. Tennessee· 2013-09-04· cited 11×
- Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.N.D. Ohio· 2018-11-05· cited 9×
- Hildebrant v. Meredith Corp.E.D. Michigan· 2014-10-23· cited 4×
- Dahn v. Adoption AllianceD. Colorado· 2016-02-17· cited 4×
- Campbell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-01-20· cited 2×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court· 1950-11-13· cited 2,057×
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1992-05-21· cited 1,717×
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 1,111×
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,072×
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthoritySeventh Circuit· 1993-11-24· cited 384×
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 336×
- Goldwater Et Al. v. Carter, President of the United States, Et Al.Supreme Court· 1979-12-13· cited 201×
- James M. Day v. Wayne County Board of Auditors, Wayne County Civil Service Commission, County of Wayne, and Wayne County Board of CommissionersSixth Circuit· 1984-12-06· cited 201×
- Figueroa v. LeFevreSupreme Court· 1979-12-10· cited 188×
- Ruth Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools Chippewa Valley School Board of Education George Depillo Thomas Scullen and Edward SkowneskiSixth Circuit· 1987-10-16· cited 150×
- Al Burzynski, Administrator of the Estate of Alfred W. Halevan, Deceased v. William S. Cohen, Secretary of DefenseSixth Circuit· 2001-08-23· cited 101×
- Press, Inc. v. VerranTennessee Supreme Court· 1978-07-31· cited 90×
- Mary Tuck v. Hca Health Services of Tennessee, Inc., D/B/A Donelson HospitalSixth Circuit· 1993-11-19· cited 89×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 1980-12-10· cited 69×
- Johnson v. HowardSixth Circuit· 2001-12-12· cited 30×
- Dana Corporation v. Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust, Intervenor-Appellant, Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesSixth Circuit· 2001-06-04· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.