Aurea APONTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the Commissioner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence, the court must uphold ALJ’s decision to discount claimant’s subjective complaints
• holding that it is the Commissioner, not the reviewing court, who determines witness credibility
• holding that it is the Commissioner, not the reviewing court, that determines credibility
• holding that it is the Commissioner, not the reviewing court, that determines credibility
• noting that “[i]t is the function of the Commissioner, not the reviewing courts, to resolve evidentiary conflicts . . . ” (citation and internal punctuation omitted)
• noting that “[i]t is the function of the Commissioner, not the reviewing courts, to resolve evidentiary conflicts . . . ” (citation and internal punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).