Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 12/6/2010

Johnson v. Astrue

Citations

  • 627 F.3d 316
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24833
  • 2010 WL 4923283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the ALJ accounted for the plaintiff’s limited intellectual functioning by requiring “concrete instructions and limiting the jobs to unskilled or low semi-skilled work.”
  • finding the ALJ did not err in failing to request an IQ test because the record was sufficiently developed
  • noting the ALJ is required to obtain additional evidence “only if the medical records presented to him do not give sufficient medical evidence to determine whether the claimant is disabled”
  • “[A]n ALJ has a duty to fully develop the record, even when the claimant is represented by an attorney.” (internal quotation omitted)
  • where medical evidence supported limitations in RFC determination, hypothetical question to vocational expert using those limitations was acceptable, and substantial evidence supported finding that claimant was not disabled
  • where medical evidence supported limitations in RFC determination, hypothetical question to vocational expert using those limitations was acceptable, and substantial evidence supported finding that claimant was not disabled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Hansen, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.