Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 1/6/2011

Johnson v. Astrue

Citations

  • 628 F.3d 991
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 170
  • 2011 WL 31522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a treating physician’s opinion is given controlling weight if, and only if, it is well-supported by medically-acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with other substantial evidence
  • finding that steroid treatment that resulted in marked improvement, and entries in treatment records such as “no joint swelling,” “no other complaints,” or “doing well” were inconsistent with subjective complaints of disabling pain and fatigue
  • checkmarks on a MSS are conclusory opinions which can be discounted if contradicted by other objective medical evidence
  • checkmarks on a MSS are conclusory opinions which can be discounted if contradicted by other objective medical evidence
  • “[M]edical records prepared by the most relevant treating physicians [can] provide affirmative medical evidence supporting the ALJ’s residual functional capacity findings.”
  • In the absence of medical opinion evidence, “medical records prepared by the most relevant treating physicians [can] provide affirmative medical evidence supporting the ALJ's residual functional capacity findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Hansen, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Johnson v. Astrue

18 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.