Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 6/26/2008

Johnson v. Astrue

Citations

  • 563 F. Supp. 2d 444
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48752
  • 2008 WL 2567788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]f the reviewing court finds substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s final decision, that decision must be upheld”
  • “The role of the reviewing court is therefore quite limited and substantial deference is to be afforded the Commissioner's decision.”
  • “[New] evidence must be . . . relevant to the alleged condition during the claimed period of impairment prior to ALJ’s decision.”
  • “[i]f the reviewing court finds substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s final decision, that decision must be upheld, even if substantial evidence supporting the claimant’s position also exists”
  • “If the reviewing court finds substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's final decision, that decision must be upheld, even if substantial evidence supporting the claimant's position also exists.”
  • “If the reviewing court finds substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s final decision, that decision must be upheld, even if substantial evidence supporting the claimant's position also exists”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gabriel W. Gorenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.