John Macsherry, Jr. v. Sparrows Point, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court must “consider whether a limited purpose is inseparable from one foreclosed under Rule 408(a)”
• vacating and remanding for a new trial where evidentiary error harmed the defendants—despite other evidence supporting plaintiff’s claim—because of its likelihood of swaying the jury’s consideration of the evidence and determination of damages
• interpreting movant’s request to strike double recovery damages as arising under Rule 59(e)
• “because the district court found that the Compromise Statements were admissible without limitation, the court allowed them to be used for one of the very purposes foreclosed [under Rule 408]: to prove the validity of the claim that ‘the compromise offer was meant to settle’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
  Fourth Circuit· 2020-11-19· cited 74×
• United States v. Robert McCabe
  Fourth Circuit· 2024-06-03· cited 19×
• United States v. Zackary Sanders
  Fourth Circuit· 2024-07-09

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. Bogash
  Supreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 531×
• Trebor Sportswear Co., Inc. And Rotano Sportswear Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. The Limited Stores, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1989-01-12· cited 247×
• Swofford v. B & W, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1964-07-28· cited 193×
• Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1977-10-11· cited 173×
• Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 1967-03-14· cited 170×
• United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Infinity Group Co.
  Third Circuit· 2000-05-04· cited 166×
• Iacobucci v. Town of Pembroke
  First Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 156×
• Ruth Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools Chippewa Valley School Board of Education George Depillo Thomas Scullen and Edward Skowneski
  Sixth Circuit· 1987-10-16· cited 150×
• Melvin K. Rowlett, Sr. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1987-11-04· cited 141×
• Louise Parrott, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Parrott, Deceased v. Max v. Wilson, Etc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-06-23· cited 125×
• McCray v. Burrell
  Fourth Circuit· 1975-04-10· cited 121×
• Affiliated Manufacturers, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of America
  Third Circuit· 1995-06-06· cited 104×
• United States Ex Rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey
  Fourth Circuit· 2015-07-02· cited 101×
• Admiral Mortgage, Inc. v. Cooper
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-07· cited 91×
• Claudette Lutz v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205 Governing Board of Glendale Union High School, District No. 205
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 81×
• Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1987-04-07· cited 81×
• Medex v. McCabe
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-14· cited 77×
• William Malbon, Jr. And Thomas M. Malbon, Partners, T/a Malbon Brothers Farm v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company
  Fourth Circuit· 1980-12-30· cited 63×
• Amf Tuboscope, Inc., and American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Joe H. Cunningham and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1965-10-06· cited 56×
• Samuel David Stockman, D.D.S. v. Oakcrest Dental Center, P.C., Louis E. Leonor, D.D.S., Individually
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-03-16· cited 44×