Claudette Lutz v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205 Governing Board of Glendale Union High School, District No. 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no right to a jury trial on a claim for back pay under Title VII or the Rehabilitation Act
• holding that Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(i)’s 90–day rule “applies only ‘[i]n the absence of other directions from the court’”
• holding that back pay under the ADA is an equitable remedy to be determined by the court
• holding that back pay under the ADA is an equitable remedy to be determined by the court
• holding that back pay under the ADA is an equitable remedy to be determined by the court
• holding that there is no right for a jury to determine either back pay or front pay because those are equitable remedies to be decided by a court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).