Affiliated Manufacturers, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming exclusion of internal memoranda where they were “prepared as a basis for compromise negotiations, particularly because the memoranda appeared to be intended to assist in calculation of compromise figures discussed subsequently”
• considering the factual context to determine whether Rule 408 had been triggered
• motion for new trial based on alleged error in the admission of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).