John Doe v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to state a claim for [an ACA] Section 1557 violation, a plaintiff must state facts adequate to state a claim under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
• finding that plaintiffs adequately alleged disability discrimination where defendant “denied meaningful access to their prescription drug benefit,” thereby preventing plaintiffs from receiving “effective” treatment
• stating discrimination claims under the ACA “must allege facts adequate to 28 state a claim under Section 504”
• reciting elements of an 21 ADA accommodations claim and claims under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
• adopting logic of Doe v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., 926 F.3d 235 (6th Cir. 2019)
• “The UCL prohibits unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business acts or 3 practices. Each of these three adjectives captures a separate and distinct theory of 4 liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Francois v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp
  Fifth Circuit· 2021-08-06· cited 19×
• Neil Basta v. Novant Health Incorporated
  Fourth Circuit· 2022-12-27· cited 11×
• Rodney Woodland v. Montero Hill
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-05-16· cited 7×
• Breeze, Jr. v. Kabila Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2021-12-15
• William Ellis v. Salt River Project
  Ninth Circuit· 2022-01-31
• Naranjo v. Doctors Medical Ctr. of Modesto, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2025-05-23

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Alexander v. Choate
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 1,271×
• Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-08· cited 1,018×
• Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-23· cited 625×
• Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 271×
• Durell v. Sharp Healthcare
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-04-19· cited 265×
• Carl Curtis v. Irwin Industries, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-01-25· cited 212×
• Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-08-01· cited 203×
• Colleen v. Ford v. Schering-Plough Corporation Schering Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
  Third Circuit· 1998-05-22· cited 200×
• Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-01-03· cited 196×
• Howard L. Chabner v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-09-11· cited 173×
• Vernon Crowder Stephanie Good v. Yukio Kitagawa, Chairman, Board of Agriculture, State of Hawaii Calvin Lum
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-04-30· cited 171×
• Rubio v. Capital One Bank
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-07-21· cited 150×
• Mark H. Ex Rel. Michelle H. v. Lemahieu
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-01-17· cited 147×
• Morgan v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-09-23· cited 125×
• McNeil v. Time Insurance Co
  Fifth Circuit· 2000-03-01· cited 101×
• K.M. Ex Rel. Bright v. Tustin Unified School District
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-08-06· cited 90×
• Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Kempthorne
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 84×
• John Doe v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tenn., Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2019-06-04· cited 60×
• Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2015-04-10· cited 60×
• Andrea Schmitt v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-07-14· cited 43×

Other cases named John Doe v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• John Doe v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-12-09