John Carter v. James Galloway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there must be much more than mere awareness of an inmate’s generally problematic nature
• holding that there must be much more than mere awareness of an inmate’s generally problematic nature
• holding that jail officials’ generalized awareness that an inmate was a violence-prone troublemaker was not enough to show they were subjectively aware that he posed a substantial risk of serious harm to the plaintiff
• holding that “much more” than mere awareness of generally problematic nature is required
• explaining that deliberate indifference requires “much more than mere awareness” of the “generally problematic nature” of an issue
• noting that a generalized awareness of risk that an inmate is problematic may satisfy an objective standard or negligence, but it does not satisfy the subjective standard required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).