Marcia Williams v. BellSouth Telecommunications

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that decision to deny benefits was not “wrong” under de novo standard, thereby obviating need to perform heightened arbitrary and capricious review
• affirming summary judgment for administrator after determining that benefits decision was not “de novo wrong”
• “Because no grounds exist to disturb Kemper’s determination under the de novo review standard, we need not review it under the more deferential (‘mere’ or ‘heightened’ arbitrary and capricious) standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).