Fourth Circuit· 11/21/2012
Jimmy Martin v. Reginald Lloyd
Citations
- 700 F.3d 132
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24054
- 2012 WL 5871623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] facial challenge is ineffective if the statute has a plainly legitimate sweep.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[M]odern scientific research supports the commonsense notion that 18-to-20-year-olds tend to be more impulsive than young adults aged 21 and over.”
- “[M]odern scientific research supports the commonsense notion that 18-to-20-year-olds tend to be more impulsive than young adults aged 21 and over.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkinson, Motz, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carolina Youth Action Project v. Alan WilsonFourth Circuit· 2023-02-22· cited 44×
- Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2016-02-04· cited 34×
- Doe 1 v. CooperFourth Circuit· 2016-11-30· cited 32×
- Dennis Fusaro v. Charlton T. Howard, IIIFourth Circuit· 2021-11-19· cited 30×
- Stephen V. Kolbe v. Martin J. O'MalleyD. Maryland· 2014-08-22· cited 17×
- Adam Toghill v. Harold ClarkeFourth Circuit· 2017-12-15· cited 14×
- Capital Associated Indus., Inc. v. SteinM.D. North Carolina· 2017-09-19· cited 10×
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 99 v. BennettD. Arizona· 2013-03-29· cited 9×
- United States v. Gaston SaundersFourth Circuit· 2016-07-05· cited 8×
- United States v. Mohammad ChaudhriFourth Circuit· 2025-04-08· cited 6×
- Madison Lara v. Commissioner PA State PoliceThird Circuit· 2024-03-27· cited 4×
- Madison Lara v. Commissioner PA State PoliceThird Circuit· 2025-02-26· cited 3×
- Boardwalk Bros. v. SatzS.D. Florida· 2013-06-04· cited 1×
- Stephen V. Kolbe v. Martin J. O'MalleyD. Maryland· 2014-08-12
- John Doe v. 1Fourth Circuit· 2016-11-30
- Nikki Thomas v. Nancy BerryhillFourth Circuit· 2019-02-22
- United States v. ElshinawyD. Maryland· 2017-03-06
- United States v. Zahida AmanFourth Circuit· 2025-04-08
- United States v. Mohammed ChaudhriFourth Circuit· 2025-04-08
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2008-05-19· cited 1,677×
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,180×
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 902×
- Crawford v. Marion County Election BoardSupreme Court· 2008-04-28· cited 564×
- United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 256×
- Nader v. BlairFourth Circuit· 2008-12-12· cited 252×
- Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1915-01-11· cited 147×
- Real Truth About Abortion, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionFourth Circuit· 2012-06-12· cited 61×
- United States v. ComstockFourth Circuit· 2010-12-06· cited 51×
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-07· cited 46×
- Aminoil, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyC.D. California· 1984-09-28· cited 32×
- South Carolina Medical Ass'n v. ThompsonFourth Circuit· 2003-04-25· cited 29×
- State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-09-28· cited 20×
- Wright v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1985-01-14· cited 16×
- Ward v. West Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-12· cited 11×
- Sun Light Prepaid Phonecard Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-07-06· cited 9×
- South Carolina Law Enforcement Division v. 1-Speedmaster S/N 00218Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-09-27· cited 4×
- United States v. David LeeFourth Circuit· 1987-05-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.