State v. DeAngelis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a jury’s determination that a game requiring “no skill” was illegal under a predecessor statute
• whether a \one-armed bandit is a slot machine is a question of fact for the jury\
• whether a “one-armed bandit is a slot machine is a question of fact for the jury”
• court could not revoke probation where sentencing order was ambiguous whether defendant was “in a probationary status” at time offenses were committed; “[a]mbiguity or doubts relative to a sentence should be resolved in favor of the accused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martin v. Stewart
  Fourth Circuit· 2007-08-29· cited 60×
• Jimmy Martin v. Reginald Lloyd
  Fourth Circuit· 2012-11-21· cited 45×
• State v. Padilla
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-09-01· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Ruiz
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-03-31· cited 18×
• State v. Haulcomb
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-03-20· cited 11×
• State v. Dickinson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 11×
• Mims v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-10-24· cited 11×
• State v. Four Video Slot MacHines
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-01-23· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Phillips
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-07-24· cited 6×
• Tant v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-05-28· cited 6×
• Rallo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-05· cited 4×
• Venable v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-05-10· cited 4×
• State v. Loftin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-02-17· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. DeAngelis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-07-08· cited 7×