Stephen V. Kolbe v. Martin J. O'Malley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, although the FSA prohibits “a class of weapons that the plaintiffs desire to use for self-defense in the home, there is no evidence demonstrating their removal will significantly impact the core protection of the Second Amendment” (emphasis and citation omitted)
• “[T]he court cannot conclude that the [FSA] fails to provide sufficient notice of banned conduct.”
• “[T]he court cannot conclude that the [FSA] fails to provide sufficient notice of banned conduct.”
• “The court cannot conclude that the State of Maryland is treating differently persons who are in all relevant respects alike, and the plaintiffs’ equal protection challenge must fail.”
• “The court cannot conclude that the State of Maryland is treating differently persons who are in all relevant respects alike, and the plaintiffs’ equal protection challenge must fail.”
• “[T]he database which Allen studied is maintained by the NRA, suggesting, if anything, that her study may have a bias in favor of finding more instances of the defensive use of firearms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).