Skip to main content
· 8/21/2000

Jimmerson v. Apfel

Citations

  • 111 F. Supp. 2d 846
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18453
  • 2000 WL 1253762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and awarding benefits because case had been remanded twice already, had been pending for eight years, and the record established without question that he was functionally illiterate and should not have been classified as having a “limited or less” education

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.