District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/30/2016
Jimenez v. State
Citations
- 201 So. 3d 214
- 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14664
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prohibiting trial court’s “direct contravention” of rules of criminal procedure when the court required that all defendants attend disposition and pretrial hearings, 3 but noting that a court may require attendance if there is “good reason to do so”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sleet, Casanueva, Lucas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Huffman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-07· cited 60×
- Cruz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-16· cited 14×
- Lynch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-04· cited 9×
- Suarez v. Port Charlotte HMA, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-17· cited 7×
- Stout v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-26· cited 6×
- Charlemagne v. GuevaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-27· cited 5×
- Walters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-28· cited 3×
- McDermott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.