Walters v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Eighth Circuit does not have the authority, by issuance of an administrative order, to adopt a blanket circumvention of the criminal rules of procedure.”
• “[A]bsent a finding of good cause for requiring the presence of the defendant at a pre-trial conference, the trial court does not possess the discretion to deny a defendant the ability to waive his appearance at pre-trial proceedings . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Charlemagne v. Guevara
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-27· cited 5×
• Jimenez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-30· cited 2×
• Malik Sands v. Sherea Green, Etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-12-12

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pardo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-26· cited 289×
• Kearse v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-29· cited 93×
• Mazer v. Orange County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-28· cited 26×
• Cruz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-16· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Evans v. Chappel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-02-05· cited 10×
• CAUCUS OF BLACK STATE LEGISLATORS v. Crosby
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-14· cited 9×
• Sancho v. Joanos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-25· cited 9×
• Lynch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-04· cited 9×
• Stout v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-26· cited 6×
• Reynolds v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-03· cited 6×
• Tellis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 4×