Supreme Court of Florida· 6/7/2000
Huffman v. State
Citations
- 813 So. 2d 10
- 2001 WL 617716
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a petitioner for a writ of mandamus “has no right to continue to file procedurally barred . . . petitions” and, therefore, “is not entitled to mandamus relief as a means to override the lower courts’ sanction orders”
- holding petitioners for postconviction relief convicted of crimes classified as capital, but not actually sentenced to death, qualify as “noncapital defendants” under rule 3.850(b)
- explaining “even if a felony is classified in the Florida Statutes as a capital offense, it is not ‘capital’ under case law unless its subject to the death penalty”
- \In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus ... the petitioner must have no other adequate remedy available.\
- mandamus petition dismissed pursuant to Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So.2d 974 (Fla.2002)
- “In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus the petitioner must have a clear legal right to the requested relief, the respondent must have an indisputable legal duty to perform the requested action, and the petitioner must have no other adequate remedy available.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-11· cited 1,190×
- Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 81×
- Pleus v. CristSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-07-02· cited 20×
- Barnett v. AntonacciDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-28· cited 15×
- Tate v. McNeilSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-03-13· cited 14×
- Florida Agency For Health Care Administration v. Zuckerman Spaeder, LLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-06· cited 10×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-09· cited 9×
- Tyson v. the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-09-05· cited 7×
- Sowell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-12· cited 6×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-17· cited 5×
- Chapman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-23· cited 5×
- Leichty v. CLERK OF CIR. COURT, LAKE COUNTYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05· cited 5×
- Cecil Mathews v. Michael D. Crews, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-01-23· cited 5×
- BAILEM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-11· cited 4×
- Henderson v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-02· cited 4×
- Consumer Rights, LLC v. Bradford CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-17· cited 4×
- Putnam County Environmental Council v. Johns River Water Management DistrictDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-26· cited 4×
- Brian M. Casey v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-10-29· cited 3×
- Nelson v. CrewsSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-03-21· cited 3×
- Fails v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-20· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- Buford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-23· cited 120×
- Rusaw v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-24· cited 43×
- Turner v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-22· cited 16×
- Huffman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.