Supreme Court of Florida· 9/26/2001
Jimenez v. State
Citations
- 810 So. 2d 511
- 2001 WL 1839147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that Delgado need not be given retroactive application, because the decision is not constitutional in nature nor does it have fundamental significance
- finding statutory-interpretation case not retroactive because it was not \constitutional in nature\
- finding statutory-interpretation case not retroactive because it was not \constitutional in nature\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jose Jimenez v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2007-03-23· cited 80×
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 66×
- Hannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-08-31· cited 52×
- Jimenez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-18· cited 39×
- Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida & SC18-1321 Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-10-04· cited 25×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-28· cited 24×
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-24· cited 18×
- Fitzpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-09-11· cited 17×
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-12-18· cited 17×
- Hester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-03· cited 7×
- Hannon v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsM.D. Florida· 2007-10-23· cited 2×
- Jimenez v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2002-05-13· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.