Skip to main content

Foster v. State

Citations

  • 861 So. 2d 434
  • 2002 WL 1285453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the inclusion of \remaining in\ language is not fundamental error
  • “[CJourts may, as a general proposition, consider subsequent clarifying legislation in interpreting statutes.” (citing Bell v. New Jersey, 461 U.S. 773, 784, 103 S.Ct. 2187, 76 L.Ed.2d 312 (1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.