Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 123 So. 3d 656
  • 2013 WL 5629443
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence was legally insufficient to prove that the driver of a jointly occupied vehicle actually possessed drug paraphernalia in the driver's side visor, even where the driver was fumbling behind the visor at the time
  • holding that evidence was legally insufficient to prove that the driver of a jointly occupied vehicle actually possessed drug paraphernalia in the driver's side visor, even where the driver was fumbling behind the visor at the time
  • holding that evidence was legally insufficient to prove that the driver of a jointly occupied vehicle actually possessed drug paraphernalia in the driver's side visor, even where the driver was fumbling behind the visor at the time
  • \[T]he location of contraband -5- in plain view of the defendant is sufficient to establish the knowledge element of constructive possession.\ (alteration in original) (quoting Jiles v. State, 984 So. 2d 622, 623 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd, Larose, Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.