Skip to main content

Jestice v. Jestice

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 122

Syllabus

The domestic relations court did not err by denying appellant's motion for attorney fees, or by finding appellant was voluntarily unemployed and imputing income to appellant for child support determination purposes, where no abuse of discretion occurred given the record before the court supported the domestic relations court's decisions.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.