Sawyer v. Raney
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 690
Syllabus
The domestic relations court did not err by dismissing appellant/cross-appellee's motion to modify spousal support where the domestic relations court's general reservation of jurisdiction over the issue was not done in accordance with R.C. 3105.18(E)(2), nor did the domestic relations court err by denying appellee/cross-appellant's motion for attorney fees where that decision did not constitute an abuse of discretion.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a prisoner’s transfer from a minimum-security facility to a maximum-security facility could amount to retaliation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.