Jestice v. Jestice
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 122
Syllabus
The domestic relations court did not err by denying appellant's motion for attorney fees, or by finding appellant was voluntarily unemployed and imputing income to appellant for child support determination purposes, where no abuse of discretion occurred given the record before the court supported the domestic relations court's decisions.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Agency regulation under 16 U.S.C.A. § 824d(d): agency’s substitution of sixty-day period for statutory thirty-day period invalid
- Agency regulation under 16 U.S.C.A. § 824d(d): agency’s substitution of sixty-day period for statutory thirty-day period invalid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.