In Re John Paul Fitzgerald, Debtor. Jean A. Fitzgerald v. John Paul Fitzgerald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, with no disapproval, that “[w]e have found no case in which a court discharged past-due obligations that were intended as support by the state court or parties”
• In Calhoun, “it was necessary to determine whether something not denominated as support in the divorce decree was really support[.] [H]ere the ... question is whether something denominated as alimony is really alimony and not, for example, a property settlement in disguise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).