Jensen v. Knowles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff's allegation that defendants were withholding 5 religious books insufficient to satisfy the imminent danger exception of § 1915(g)
• finding plaintiff's allegation that 8 defendants were withholding religious books not sufficient to satisfy the imminent danger 9 || exception of § 1915(g)
• “it is highly unlikely [the defendant] 21 vanished from the CDCR without so much as a last known address”
• explaining why Jones v. Bock does not alter Wyatt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).