Skip to main content

Jensen v. Jensen

Citations

  • 103 Md. App. 678
  • 654 A.2d 914
  • 1995 Md. App. LEXIS 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “one of the purposes of the [Act] was to change the focus of alimony from a form of lifetime pension toward a bridge to self-sufficiency”
  • stating that “one of the purposes of the [Act] was to change the focus of alimony from a form of lifetime pension toward a bridge to self- sufficiency”
  • allowing wife to pursue reinstatement of alimony 17 years after termination because of her unforeseen disability
  • a chancellor’s ruling on a purely narrow issue of law is not entitled to deference
  • chancellor’s ruling on a purely narrow issue of law is not entitled to deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.