Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/1/1995
Jensen v. Jensen
Citations
- 103 Md. App. 678
- 654 A.2d 914
- 1995 Md. App. LEXIS 47
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “one of the purposes of the [Act] was to change the focus of alimony from a form of lifetime pension toward a bridge to self-sufficiency”
- stating that “one of the purposes of the [Act] was to change the focus of alimony from a form of lifetime pension toward a bridge to self- sufficiency”
- allowing wife to pursue reinstatement of alimony 17 years after termination because of her unforeseen disability
- a chancellor’s ruling on a purely narrow issue of law is not entitled to deference
- chancellor’s ruling on a purely narrow issue of law is not entitled to deference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Innerbichler v. InnerbichlerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-16· cited 64×
- Malin v. MininbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-01· cited 27×
- McQuay v. SchertleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-06-02· cited 21×
- Karmand v. KarmandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-07-02· cited 18×
- Digges v. DiggesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-26· cited 18×
- In re Michael G.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-30· cited 17×
- Oliver v. HaysCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-04· cited 14×
- Fischbach v. FischbachCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 13×
- Whittington v. WhittingtonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-04· cited 9×
- Morales v. MoralesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-10-29· cited 9×
- K.B. v. D.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-29· cited 2×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tracey v. TraceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-29· cited 134×
- Brodak v. BrodakCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-21· cited 62×
- Turrisi v. SanzaroCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-02-04· cited 42×
- Rohrbaugh v. Estate of SternCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-28· cited 37×
- Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-11-05· cited 27×
- Bricker v. BrickerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-08· cited 25×
- Willoughby v. WilloughbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-04· cited 25×
- Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-08-13· cited 23×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-07-10· cited 23×
- Cole v. ColeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-20· cited 22×
- Lott v. LottCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-04-06· cited 19×
- Buehler v. BuehlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-07-09· cited 15×
- Athanason v. AthanasonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-10· cited 9×
- Kingsley v. KingsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-04-09· cited 7×
- Weidner v. WeidnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-09· cited 6×
- Young v. YoungCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-12-12· cited 5×
- Benner v. BennerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-09-15· cited 5×
- Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.