Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/31/2003
Jenkins v. Concorde Acceptance Corp.
Citations
- 802 N.E.2d 1270
- 345 Ill. App. 3d 669
- 280 Ill. Dec. 749
- 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- section 2-619.1 does not authorize hybrid motion practice; defendants erred by raising affirmative matters pertinent to a section 2-619 motion in their section 2-615 motion to dismiss
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reynolds v. Jimmy John's Enterprises, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-04-02· cited 199×
- McIntosh v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 2019-12-10· cited 52×
- Floyd Ex Rel. Floyd v. Rockford Park Dist.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-01-12· cited 47×
- Casey v. Federal Deposit InsuranceEighth Circuit· 2009-10-20· cited 28×
- Howle v. Aqua Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-10-31· cited 26×
- Akinyemi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-05-08· cited 16×
- Country Mutual Insurance v. D & M Tile, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-09-29· cited 13×
- Fausnight v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama· 2008-05-23· cited 9×
- Cohen v. Compact Power Systems, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-04-04· cited 9×
- Nava v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-07-29· cited 6×
- Glover v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2023-02-10· cited 4×
- Weisberg v. Chicago SteelAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-12-31· cited 3×
- City of Chicago v. Comcast Cable HoldingsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-17· cited 3×
- City of Chicago v. COMCAST CABLE HOLDINGSAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-08-23
- Akinyemi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NAAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-05-08
- Michael Casey v. North American SavingsEighth Circuit· 2009-10-20
- Floyd v. Rockford Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-01-12
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-08-04· cited 518×
- Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 410×
- Miller v. William Chevrolet/GEO, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-11-27· cited 127×
- Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-08· cited 121×
- Illinois Glass Co. v. Chicago Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1908-06-18· cited 91×
- Storm & Associates, Ltd. v. CuculichAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-08-28· cited 75×
- Groves v. Farmers State BankIllinois Supreme Court· 1937-12-17· cited 57×
- Joseph v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-08-03· cited 50×
- Tovar v. Paxton Community Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-06-12· cited 43×
- Nielsen-Massey Vanillas, Inc. v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-11-20· cited 41×
- Douthart v. CongdonIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-06-19· cited 38×
- Ransburg v. HaaseAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-01-24· cited 33×
- Kanter & Eisenberg v. Madison AssociatesIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-05-22· cited 32×
- Kaplan v. Tabb Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-11-02· cited 30×
- Lozoff v. Shore Heights, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-04-05· cited 22×
- R-Five, Inc. v. Shadeco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-04· cited 22×
- Evans v. FunkIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-06-19· cited 21×
- T.E.C. & Associates, Inc. v. Alberto-Culver Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-03-19· cited 18×
- Commercial National Bank v. BrunoIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 16×
- Baehr v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 16×
Other cases named Jenkins v. Concorde Acceptance Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.