Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an issue that was never raised in the trial court was waived on appeal
• holding that an unfairness determination should consider: “(1) whether the practice offends public policy; (2) whether it is immoral, unethical, oppressive, or unscrupulous; (3) whether it causes substantial injury to consumers”
• noting that a consumer \compelled to pay an unreasonable amount ... in excess of what she [had] ... agreed to pay\ suffered \substantial harm\ under the ICFA
• noting that a consumer “compelled to pay an unreasonable amount … in excess of what she [had] … agreed to pay” suffered “substantial harm” under the ICFA
• “... for one injury there should only be one recovery irrespective of the availability of multiple remedies and actions”
• an appellant may not raise a new argument for the first time on appeal; arguments not raised in the trial court are considered forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).