Cohen v. Compact Power Systems, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff was not diligent where he failed to file a certification motion or to conduct discovery during “the eight-month life span of this case”
• plaintiff was not diligent where he failed to file a certification motion or to conduct discovery during “the eight-month life span of this case”
• “when the named plaintiff never files this motion [for class certification], the question becomes whether, under the circumstances, the plaintiff exercised the required reasonable diligence in pursuing his class action claim”
• “when the named plaintiff never files this motion [for class certification], the question becomes whether, under the circumstances, the plaintiff exercised the required reasonable diligence in pursuing his class action claim”
• plaintiff’s claim is not moot if “the timing of the defendant’s tender” indicates that it “was an attempt to unfairly ‘pick off’ the class action representative without offering him a full opportunity to be heard.”
• plaintiffs claim is not moot if “the timing of the defendant’s tender” indicates that it “was an attempt to unfairly ‘pick off’ the class action representative without offering him a full opportunity to” be heard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).