District of Columbia· 3/7/2013
Jenkins v. Clinton
Citations
- 928 F. Supp. 2d 122
- 2013 WL 829400
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff’s recusal motion required dismissal for the same reasons as the dismissal of plaintiff’s judicial misconduct and disability complaint
- rejecting argument that, in the absence of a damages claim, plaintiff could proceed with lawsuit against judges over their judicial rulings
- “Plaintiff’s Notice of Lis Pendens presents one of those rare cases clearly requiring cancellation by the Court.”
- “[I]t is well established that judicial immunity bars claims . . . for retrospective declaratory relief of a violation of federal law.”
- “[A] judge acting in his or her judicial capacity—i.e., performing a function normally performed by a judge—is immune from suit on all judicial acts.”
- “[D]eclaratory relief against a judge for final actions taken within his or her judicial capacity is . . . available by way of direct appeal of the judge’s order.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thomas v. WilkinsDistrict of Columbia· 2014-07-24· cited 28×
- Sibley v. RobertsDistrict of Columbia· 2016-12-19· cited 10×
- Borda v. Executive Office for the United States AttorneyDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-28· cited 6×
- Jenkins v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2013-06-14· cited 1×
- Cynthia Sherwood McKenzie v. Jason Wayne McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2014-02-11
- Gerber Products Company v. VilsackDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-09
- McNeil v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-26
- McNeil v. BrownDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-26
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District of Columbia· 2021-02-16
- Kaul v. Federation of State Medical BoardsDistrict of Columbia· 2021-03-31
- Pincus Hueter v. KruseDistrict of Columbia· 2021-07-20
- Klayman v. RaoDistrict of Columbia· 2021-10-25
- Sutton Investments LLC v. PerlmutterDistrict of Columbia· 2021-12-22
- Pinson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-09
- Pincus Hueter v. KruseDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-18
- Soto Santini v. Arias MarxuachDistrict of Columbia· 2023-01-19
- Williams v. HowellDistrict of Columbia· 2023-03-06
- Wall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2025-03-31
- Doe v. Administrative Office of the U.S. CourtsDistrict of Columbia· 2025-04-15
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court· 1991-10-21· cited 4,474×
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 3,642×
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 1,617×
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorD.C. Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 985×
- Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaD.C. Circuit· 2005-08-05· cited 552×
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2001-06-28· cited 502×
- Salvatore G. Crisafi v. George E. HollandD.C. Circuit· 1981-06-17· cited 494×
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 485×
- Kent B. Crane v. New York Zoological SocietyD.C. Circuit· 1990-01-30· cited 384×
- Second Amendment Foundation v. United States Conference of MayorsSecond Circuit· 2001-12-21· cited 270×
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-07· cited 238×
- United States v. FerraraD.C. Circuit· 1995-05-19· cited 213×
- John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General CounselD.C. Circuit· 1992-02-11· cited 189×
- Environmental Research International, Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-03-26· cited 151×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.