Ghameshlouy v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the notice of appeal \is all that is required for the Court of Appeals to obtain jurisdiction over the case\
• explaining that active jurisdiction is “the power to adjudicate a particular case on the merits”
• holding that “the defect in the notice of appeal in not naming the proper appellee, which otherwise would have justified dismissal of the appeal, was potentially subject to waiver” and that a waiver occurred when the City joined in the Commonwealth’s brief (emphasis added)
• holding that “the defect in the notice of appeal in not naming the proper appellee, which otherwise would have justified dismissal of the appeal, was potentially subject to waiver” and that a waiver occurred when the City joined in the Commonwealth’s brief (emphasis added)
• stating “[a]n order of conviction for violation of [Virginia Beach City Code] § 23-7.1, styled ‘CITY v. ERIC AMIR GHAMESHLOUY,’ was entered on July 30, 2007”
• stating “[a]n order of conviction for violation of [Virginia Beach City Code] § 23-7.1, styled ‘CITY v. ERIC AMIR GHAMESHLOUY,’ was entered on July 30, 2007”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).