Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 4/26/2023

Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies Inc

Citations

  • 67 F.4th 550

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that individuals who drove for Uber were predominantly local, intrastate transporters
  • emphasizing that the inquiry focuses on the actual work performed by a particular class of workers
  • relying on same provisions of arbitration agreement to conclude that plaintiffs “remain bound by that agreement notwithstanding their subsequent opt-out”
  • evaluating the statistics and evidence made available “[t]hrough discovery” before concluding that “Uber drivers are not a class of workers engaged in interstate commerce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.