Fifth Circuit· 5/5/2017

Janvey v. Dillon Gage, Inc.

Citations

856 F.3d 377
2017 WL 1821498
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that instructions hinging on questions of statutory construction are reviewed de novo
referring to parties eligible for fees under TUFTA as “prevailing plaintiffs” or “prevailing defendants”
“Jury instructions are reviewed for abuse of discretion. . . . Instructions that hinge on a question of statutory construction are reviewed de novo.”
“[T]he jury was not required to find that SCB was insolvent at the time of the transfers.”
citation 3 Case: 17-20223 Document: 00514379666 Page: 4 Date Filed: 03/09/2018 No. 17-20223 omitted
“As a general matter, terms which are reasonably within the common understanding of juries, and which are not technical or ambiguous, need not be defined in the trial court’s charge.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Higginson, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.