Jackson Law Office, P.C. v. Chappell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming partial fee forfeiture under Burrow even though the breaches of fiduciary duty did not cause damages and even though there was no indication that the breaches were intentional
• affirming partial fee forfeiture under Burrow even though the breaches of fiduciary duty did not cause damages and even though there was no indication that the breaches were intentional
• affirming partial fee forfeiture under Burrow based in part on attorneys' breaches of fiduciary duty to fully disclose facts relating to conflicts of interest, even though there were no damages and no apparent intentional breaches
• affirming partial fee forfeiture under Burrow based in part on attorneys’ breaches of fiduciary duty to fully disclose facts relating to conflicts of interest, even though there were no damages and no apparent intentional breaches
• “The general rule is that a debtor has the right to prefer his obligation to one creditor over an obligation to another creditor.”
• stating that once jury determines that defendant has violated DTPA, question still remains as to reasonableness and necessity of attorney’s fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).