N.D. Iowa· 2/27/1986
Jansen v. Greyhound Corp.
Citations
- 692 F. Supp. 1022
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28771
- 1986 WL 20901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Varsic; defendant found in district where plaintiffs worked, where plaintiffs earned their benefits, and to which defendants sent plaintiffs’ benefit checks
- company denied summary judgment because of sufficient factual issues concerning which entity is the plan administrator; letters regarding retirement benefits were sent on defendant's stationery
- company denied summary judgment because of sufficient factual issues concerning which entity is the plan administrator; letters regarding retirement benefits were sent on defendant’s stationery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donald E. O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- John A. Waeltz and Herbert A. Johnson, Jr. v. Delta Pilots Retirement PlanSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-23· cited 32×
- Rosen v. Trw, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1992-12-11· cited 26×
- Sanders v. State Street Bank and Trust Co.S.D. Texas· 1993-02-18· cited 21×
- Bublitz v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.S.D. Iowa· 2001-07-25· cited 14×
- Redfield v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (In Re Robertson)N.D. Illinois· 1990-06-19· cited 12×
- Waeltz, John A. v. Delta Pilots RetireSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-23
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- James W. Sanderson v. The Honorable Fred M. Winner, United States District Judge for the District OfcoloradoTenth Circuit· 1975-04-14· cited 69×
- Ralston v. Volkswagenwerk, A. G.W.D. Missouri· 1973-08-23· cited 50×
- Boyer v. J. A. Majors Co. Employees' Profit Sharing PlanN.D. Georgia· 1979-12-10· cited 46×
- Sommers v. Abraham Lincoln Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nE.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-03-25· cited 40×
- P.D.Q. Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.S.D. Florida· 1973-12-06· cited 38×
- Dirks v. Clayton Brokerage Co.D. Minnesota· 1985-03-12· cited 36×
- Bostic v. Ohio River Co. (Ohio DiVision) Basic Pension PlanS.D. West Virginia· 1981-07-06· cited 24×
- Ballinger v. PerkinsW.D. Virginia· 1981-06-08· cited 17×
- Musto v. American General Corp.M.D. Tennessee· 1985-08-23· cited 16×
- Richard Bradsher and June Bradsher v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, Missouri Pacific Truck Lines, Inc., Vertac, Inc. And Vertac Chemical CorporationEighth Circuit· 1982-06-17· cited 12×
- Rode v. Emery Air Freight Corp.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-10-05· cited 12×
- Fertig v. Blue CrossN.D. Iowa· 1974-05-06· cited 8×
- Ferraro v. General Motors Corp.D. New Jersey· 1984-06-12· cited 8×
- In re McDonnell Douglas Corp. Securities LitigationE.D. Missouri· 1981-12-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.