Boyer v. J. A. Majors Co. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting employer’s motion to dismiss because “responsibility for administration of the [p]lan” was vested on a committee and “there [was] no evidence that the [employer] controlled the Plan or had anything to do with its administration”
• “only if an administrator is not so designated is the ‘plan sponsor’ (the employer) deemed to be the administrator”
• in action against profit sharing plan, employer, and trustee bank, claim against employer was dismissed in absence of evidence that employer participated in plan administration
• for purposes of ERISA venue provision, breach of plan occurred where decision to stop benefit payment was ordered, which was where plan was administered
• plan document providing that all decisions of the claims administrator regarding any disputes and questions about the meaning, interpretation, or application of the plan “shall be final”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).