James W. Sanderson v. The Honorable Fred M. Winner, United States District Judge for the District Ofcolorado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there is no right to discovery of assets under Rule 69 until judgment is obtained
• holding that tax returns “are not generally discoverable” unless “plaintiff’s income is directly in issue”
• stating that it was unnecessary to reach the issue of privilege because the requested discovery was not relevant and thus not permitted
• barring discovery into representative’s financial status when counsel agrees to advance costs of litigation
• reversing order requiring production of fee agreement noting “Defendant will have ample opportunity for discovery under Rule 69, if it obtains judgment”
• “Tax returns are not generally discoverable. It is only when the plaintiff’s income is directly in issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).