Skip to main content
· 3/9/2017

Janiszewski v. Belmont Career Ctr.

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 855

Syllabus

The evidence when viewed in Appellant's favor does not demonstrate there is a genuine issue of material fact as to the third requirement of a prima facie case for hostile work environment based on sex The actions, even when viewed in her favor, were not severe and pervasive as to affect employment Appellant could not establish she was treated differently than a similarly situated person Appellees were not required to accommodate Appellant Appellees established a qualified privilege on the defamation claim Appellant's reliance on a statement by someone without authority to make it did not constitute actionable fraud Settlement agreement did not foreclose statutory claims.

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.