Skip to main content

James v. State

Citations

  • 706 So. 2d 64
  • 1998 WL 45258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding instruction was fundamental error when it permitted the jury to find that one alleged victim was threatened while the other had a well-founded fear that violence was imminent
  • “Lumping alleged victims together in a single count of aggravated assault and permitting the jury to return a verdict of “guilty as charged” creates serious due process problems.”
  • finding fundamental error in an “and/or” jury instruction based on a single count of aggravated assault with a firearm because the evidence adduced at trial established two distinct and independent offenses which lacked a necessary connection to each other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.