Skip to main content

Barnett v. State

Citations

  • 121 So. 3d 643
  • 2013 WL 4822119
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cautioning “the State and trial judges about the use of ‘and/or’ in informa-tions and jury instructions” because such use “may create the possibility for non-unanimous verdicts”
  • “The State’s opportunity to pursue alternative theories of the commission of a crime includes situations in which the information alleges more than one victim.”
  • “Courts must analyse the totality of the record to determine -if an errant instruction is fundamental error.” (quoting Dempsey v. State, 72 So.3d 258, 261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011))
  • “It is the trial judge’s responsibility to ‘ensure that the jury is fully and correctly instructed as to the applicable law.’ The importance of proper jury instructions is particularly critical where the State pursues alternative theories of guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conner, Damoorgian, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.